Entry
| Pageviews |
|---|---|
Malaysia
|
8219
|
United States
|
2346
|
United Kingdom
|
994
|
India
|
608
|
France
|
463
|
Russia
|
393
|
Germany
|
342
|
Netherlands
|
287
|
Singapore
|
247
|
Denmark
|
198
|
Since December 2007, I created this research blog to facilitate me to do my PhD. I completed my research in December 2010 and I want to keep this blog. Its allow me to continue writing and sharing my views on urban and regional planning. This blog will create a new networking among researchers and give me a confidence but never allowed me to become complacent...DR. AZMIZAM ABDUL RASHID
Monday, 15 October 2012
TOTAL PEOPLE VIEW MY BLOG IS 19,945 AS AT 25 OCTOBER 2012
Saturday, 6 October 2012
SUSTAINABILITY ASSESSMENT FOR REMBAU DISTRICT DRAFT LOCAL PLAN 2025
OVERVIEW
The study is colaboration with Federal Department of Town and Country Planning (FDTCP), State Planning Department of Negeri Sembilan and Southern Zone Project Office. The country’s sustainable development policy and
strategy needs a systematic and comprehensive approach to balance physical,
economic, environmental and social needs. The preparation of a Development Plan
according to the Town and Country Planning Act (Act 172), namely Structural
Plan (SP), Local Plan (LP) and Special Area Plan (SAP) are the foundations in
achieving sustainable development goals. FDTCP has conducted a Pilot SA Study in 2004 through
the Kuala Selangor District Council Local Plan(RTMDKS/MDKSLP). The SA Process
in RTMDKS has been improved and used in LP studies under the Ninth Malaysia
Plan (9MP). Sustainability Assessment is an assessment method designed to
evaluate if a plan, policy or programme can achieve sustainable development
objectives. Generally, SA is a good planning practice and supports sustainable
development where Malaysia is a signatory to Agenda 21.
FDTCP has practiced the principles of physical
planning, economy, environment and social, but conducted each separately by
sector. This SA method empowers that practice in an integrated and systematic
manner where assessment is documented more effectively. Sustainability issues
are matters that were brought up by the target group during the FGD session
that was conducted in the early stages of LP preparation. Issues can also be
gleaned from discussions with LAs and technical agencies as well as from development
planning documents. Sustainability issues of study areas are categorised into
social, environmental and economic issues. In the context of SA, an indicator is a sign
that can measure the level of sustainability of an area.
A headline indicator can be identified in the
beginning of study after identifying sustainability assessment criteria.
Indicators can determine early measures to overcome issues to achieve
sustainability objectives. Indicators also have targets and can be a tool to
monitor of an LP target has been met. Identified
indicators must be able to be translated in spatial form. Indicators can be
generated from assessment criteria through Study Team discussion or when suited
to identified sustainability objectives, MURNInet indicators can be used too.
Other sources such as RFN, RSN, Malaysian Life Quality Index (UPE) and
indicators modified from foreign SA practices can also be used.
There are many evaluation methods, either qualitative
or quantitative. As a pilot initiative, a simple method is used, based on the
value gleaned from discussion and open feedback between the core team and
technical agency to get a group agreement if a proposal is compatible, not
compatible, neutral or irrelevant to sustainability objectives. Evaluation is
made based on quality where the results from the discussion is accepted as a
group final decision. This is because the agencies present are experts in their
respective fields and are able to make good decisions based on the expert
judgement method. The evaluation through discussion is a good and effective
evaluation method.
Futher enquiry about this article kindly contact :
DR. AZMIZAM ABDUL RASHID
Research and Development Division,
Federal Department of Town and Country Planning,
Ministry of Housing and Local Government,
Unit No. 50-12-2B, & 50-13-1, Wisma UOA Damansara,
No. 50, Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights,
50490 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
email address : azmizam@townplan.gov.mySunday, 16 September 2012
URBAN HAPPINESS INDEX : A LITERATURE REVIEW
DR. AZMIZAM ABDUL RASHID
Research and Development Division,
Federal Department of Town and Country Planning,
Ministry of Housing and Local Government,
Unit No. 50-12-2B, & 50-13-1, Wisma UOA Damansara,
No. 50, Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights,
50490 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
email address : azmizam@townplan.gov.my
Saturday, 8 September 2012
MALAYSIA HAPPINESS INDEX OF THE PEOPLE : FROM NATION TO CITY
The quality of life (QoL) for Malaysians improved through better access to healthcare, public
transport, electricity and water. Measures were also taken to create a caring
society and promote community well-being. Economic development was based on
sustainability principles to ensure that the environment and natural resources
are preserved so that growth will not come at a cost to future generations. The current challenging
economic time is a good time for reflection and we should not waste the
opportunity to take stock of where we are heading as a people and a nation. Going
by the adage that life begins at 50, Malaysia is still a fairly young nation
and adopting more inclusive policies that mobilise the country's rich human and
natural resources will be able to cushion the country from any adverse external
shocks. In its place is the emphasis on personal virtues and wholesome values
of integrity, honesty, generosity and empathy for other people. We believe the
promoting of such values will set the foundation for wholesome community and
nation building for our country. The
Bhutan story must have prompted many of us to start reflecting on our journey
of life, and how we have fared in terms of the happiness index.
Come to
think of it, since the world economy is on the verge of a double-dip scenario
and there will be very low or no growth in most nations, some tweaking in
national policies and priorities may be what Malaysia needs to see our country
and the people through the challenging time?
It may be a good idea for us to draw up a Malaysian Happiness Index to
measure how our people are faring against the rest of the world. In Malaysia's
case, the need for concerted efforts to build adequate public infrastructure
and housing cannot be over-emphasised as the on-going efforts are still quite
fragmented. Instead of involving so many agencies in the execution process,
having a dedicated agency as the master planner to oversee the overall planning
and execution of the projects will ensure a higher rate of success to benefit
more people.
Providing
enough public housing and other social amenities should be accorded one of the
top priorities along with the other economic-based initiatives under the
government's Economic Transformation Programme (ETP). The sharp increase in
prices of goods and services, including that of property, meant people have
less disposable income and spending power. These projects will be able to wipe
out the many squatters and slumps, and rejuvenate our cities. Focusing on
public housing can also provide a cushion for the property market from
stagnating during troubling economic times.If happiness could be measured via a country's
economic performance in gross national product or gross domestic product, then
Malaysia would be the world's 51st happiest country. In Malaysia's case, there
were a number of factors that led to its 51st ranking. Materialistic prosperity
of individuals may have been one thing but wealth, usually an indicator of a
person's material well-being, was not the only crucial factor in this
determination.
There were factors
such as a person's general disposition, the level of contentment with basic
aspirations which were also taken into account.
However, Malaysia was ranked 2nd in Southeast Asia, behind Singapore
which emerged as the happiest in the region. On a worldwide basis, the island
was ranked 33rd out of the 156 countries. Thailand was ranked 52nd, Myanmar
landed at 74th position and Indonesia was 83rd.The report will also allow politicians—as well as the public—to assess the
effectiveness of the government’s policies in terms that really matter to
people. The ultimate aim of most policy is to improve lives, but without
proper measures of well-being it can be difficult to assess whether this is
being achieved. The success of this measurement program depends a lot on
exactly how the information is attained and then used, but this announcement
may have signaled the start of a Malaysia government agenda which puts
well-being, rather than economic growth, at the heart of its public policy.
The QoL for Malaysians improved through better
access to healthcare, public transport, electricity and water. Measures were
also taken to create a caring society and promote community well-being.
Economic development was based on sustainability principles to ensure that the
environment and natural resources are preserved so that growth will not come at
a cost to future generations.
Prime Minister Datuk Seri
Najib Tun Razak made the announcement that the Government needs to work at not
only increasing the people's earning capacity, but also on making sure that
they are happy. He said that two yardsticks would be used to measure national development
the conventional method of looking at the per capita income, and the happiness
index of people as well.
The
Federal Department of Town and Country Planning (FDTCP) is undertaking a study
in happiness indicators within Malaysia and the Economic Planning Unit (EPU)
produces the Malaysian Quality of Life Index. Whether we focus on happiness or
not, the most important thing is to continue and enhance efforts that can
provide a real understanding of what we value most as Malaysians, and find
metrics that can best measure what we ourselves define as progress. On top of
that, we also have to ensure we choose a path that will provide sustained
progress to preserve and enhance the ability of our current and future
generations to pursue our path towards happiness.
Futher enquiry about this article kindly contact :
DR. AZMIZAM ABDUL RASHID
Research and Development Division,
Federal Department of Town and Country Planning,
Ministry of Housing and Local Government,
Unit No. 50-12-2B, & 50-13-1, Wisma UOA Damansara,
No. 50, Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights,
50490 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
email address : azmizam@townplan.gov.my
Saturday, 11 August 2012
AN OVERVIEW : HAPPINESS INDEX OF THE PEOPLE CREATES SUSTAINABLE AND LIVEABLE CITY
Futher enquiry about this article kindly contact :
DR. AZMIZAM ABDUL RASHID
Research and Development Division,
Federal Department of Town and Country Planning,
Ministry of Housing and Local Government,
Unit No. 50-12-2B, & 50-13-1, Wisma UOA Damansara,
No. 50, Jalan Dungun, Damansara Heights,
50490 Kuala Lumpur,
Malaysia
email address : azmizam@townplan.gov.my
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
PEOPLE AROUND ME..FAMILY AND FRIENDS.
To my Wife, Zulaini, my sons Zulazlan, Zulazman, Zulazmir, Zulazmin dan my daughter, Nuris Zulazlin...I love you all..thank you being with me
CIRCLE OF FRIENDS... KUALA LUMPUR PROJECT OFFICE
Thank you guys...for your support and encouragement
2007 / 2008 METHODOLOGY AND QUALITATIVE RESEARCH COURSE FOR PHD CANDIDATES
My new friends during my course in INTAN 9 Jan -2 Mac 2007
KUALA LUMPUR PROJECT OFFICE, JOURNEY TO MOUNT OF KINABALU SABAH 21-22 JANUARY 2006
WE CAME, WE SAW, WE CONQUERED 4095.2 METER ABOVE SEA LEVEL
How are you, guys? Where you are now?